…I wish I’d grown up in the world Mister Rogers tried to make for us….
Mister Rogers was too good for us mere sinners.
…I wish I’d grown up in the world Mister Rogers tried to make for us….
Mister Rogers was too good for us mere sinners.
I posted that earlier to my facebook feed, and I’ll be honest… When I did it I was kind of hoping it would encourage my friend who studied the life of Fred Rogers extensively to chime in because I knew he would have something pertinent to say. I was not wrong.

“Fred Rogers had such a huge problem with both Regan (who he programmed his show against) and Bush Jr. (The latter of which is much more complicated as they had a relationship that tested Fred’s boundaries.) that I can’t say “I can’t imagine how Fred would react” I know how Fred would react based on his interactions with the lesser evils of Reagan and Bush:
1. Had he not been retired, he would have themed weeks specifically against what Trump was putting in the news cycle. When Trump mocked a disabled reporter he’d have a week on disability and inclusion, when Trump promoted sexual assault, he’d program a week on respect and physical boundaries, when he bad mouthed women he’d have strong women on for a week. Fred would have travelled to do a week on Mexico and he would have moved in an Islamic neighbor.
I know this for a fact because these are the actions he took with Regan both with his “conflict weeks” and his traveling to Russia for remotes during the Cold War.
2. Fred would have attended events Trump invited him to but he would do so on his terms. He would participate in these events as well as long as it was on his terms. Because Fred would rather speak truth into those spaces then avoid them. But Fred would not accuse, he would just bear truth, refuse to be seen as supporting an evil and exit.
This is what he did to respond to the love the Bush family had for him and his work. He even offered prayer at one of their fundraisers: but it was a challenging prayer, one insisting that those in power and privilege use that for the least of these and especially children. After delivering that prayer Fred exited the building and sat outside like a kid after soccer practice waiting for his ride, spurning the thousands of dollars a plate dinner not even gladhanding with the bushes after.
When asked why he said he had reached the limit of what he could do before becoming an accuser. He wanted to challenge but never accuse as accusation was what Fred associated with the devil.
3. Fred would accept invitations to news programs when those programs allowed him to educate parents on countering the negative things coming from the president for their children. He knew those things affected children so he wanted to spread tools on helping them reject war, violence, hatred, oppression and racism.
He did this during any presidents term if it didn’t prevent him from meeting an obligation to children (he once turned down a spot on Nightline to talk about violence and children, one of his main causes, because he had a visit to an elementary school that same morning and knew he wouldn’t be mentally present for it if he was planning for Nightline in the afternoon.)
So we need to be like Fred. Getting in between children and any normalization of Trumps ways or words. Fred would have been diligently working on how to handle Trump in the land of make believe. Just like when King Friday started building nuclear bombs with money he promised to schools. Yeah Fred wasn’t subtle.” - Rev. Kevin Ireland
The People Have Spoken
The Bigoted, Pedophobic, People Have Spoken.
…I wish I’d grown up in the world Mister Rogers tried to make for us….
The seeker arrived before the first wise man, and asked, “Is our Church of the SubGenius just an excuse to act silly?”
The wise man accepted the seeker’s hate offering, and replied, “Yes”.
The seeker left, but still felt uncertain, so he sought out another wise man, and asked, “Is our Church of the SubGenius just an excuse to act silly?”
The sage replied “No”, and the seeker continued on his quest. He seemed to need another opinion for some reason.
The third wise man took the alms, listened as the seeker asked, “Is our Church of the SubGenius just an excuse to act silly?” and promptly leapt into the startled seeker’s arms, screaming like a badly out of tune siren. Then the fellow let go, and turned away as if nothing had happened.
The seeker, understandably confused, sought out yet another sage. This one he found tending an onion bed.
He said no word and took no money. His only response to the question, “Is our Church of the SubGenius just an excuse to act silly?” was to silently and steadily pee down his pants leg.
At this point the seeker was enlightened.
(Originally posted to alt.slack sometime in the late 90s)
Capitalism would have us believe that we only deserve to be here because of what we produce, and even in our counter- cultures, even in our movements we reproduce the same idea. We only deserve to be here because of what we can produce that other people will buy with their money, time or attention. Our experience of our own lives is secondary, it is only the means of production, it is the products that matter, and unless we make ourselves into both factories and widgets we are not valuable.
"I am convinced Socialism is the only answer." -Malala Yousafzai
i cant wait for people to totally ignore this part
I agree with her.
“…[The] only answer.”
*twitch* She’s only young *twitch* she doesn’t *twitch* know *twitch* any *twitchtwitch* bet*twitchtwitchtwitch*terrrrrRRRRRARGH–
I disagree with her, because my experiences with socialism’s proponents were with idiot university students, drunk on ideology. (There was also a libertarian group, one of whom called for a libertarian revolution, for crying out loud. Idiot. Didn’t he know revolutions only produce badge-engineered fascism?)
Certainly, too many socio-political institutions lean too far towards right-wing authoritarianism, but the last thing anyone needs is some well-meaning but impatient lunatics waving around soiled red flags and cute pictures of those idealists Marx and Lenin, claiming that they have the alternative. Call me cynical, but what we need is a more centrist ideology like liberalism - but a liberalism that is not yet another obsolete nineteenth-century ideology.
Also, that absolutist, my-way-or-highway thinking… that’s revolutionist thinking. And revolutionism leads to tyranny and fascism hiding behind the badges and slogans of the intended result.
Socialism, communism, marxism, capitalism, libertarianism, representative democracy, anarchism – throw them all in the trash. They’re a hundred years old or more, designed in the days when everyone was ga-ga about Reason and Industry, the world was still infinite in size, and WWI wasn’t even a twinkle in Cassandra’s eye. They no longer function in the new finite, half-eaten, ignorant, irrational and unfair world we languish upon.
Every single one of those ideologies commits one of the following stupidities:
We are no longer living in the nineteenth century, or the ninth.
We are living (unfortunately) in the twenty-first century.
Antiquated and obsolete ideologies are useless if not harmful to us. We cannot solve space age problems with industrial, iron, or stone age tools.
We need new ideas, new systems, designed in and for the time we live in.
Sunk costs be damned.
End. of. rant.
*grrr*
50,000 words, 30 days? Yeesh. I love the idea of NaNoWriMo, but I’ve got a few issues.
So, what would be a way to solve both of these problems? Just imagine a writing herald just posting a message on tumblr saying “hey let’s actually work on stuff this month”. Now you’ve got a large community of people doing what you’re doing for the next month, there to motivate and support you. You set your own goals and find people with similar goals to be writing friends with.
I find so many writing memes complaining about how we always think and never do(and I relate to these on a spiritual level), and I know with a community’s motivation we could change that. I present to you…
Here’s how this works:
1: You’ll pick one of three groups that your goals fit the best
Working off of a daily goal. Example: I want to write 500 words every day.
Working off of weekly goals. Example: I want to write 2 chapters every week.
Working off of a total goal. Example: I want to write 20,000 words by the end of the month.
2: You’ll reply your group and goal below. This is so people with similar goals find you and can motivate you and talk about your progress.
3: Do it! Work, write, see progress being made. Be motivated by your friends!
Sometimes, you need other people to motivate you in order to keep working. Seeing people as excited as you are about your work really helps you feel great about what you’ve written and excited to write more. You can find writers who want to get the same goals as you.
Also, your goals can be anything you want. Maybe you don’t want to write a novel, not now or maybe not ever. Maybe you love short stories or poetry, and you can make that your goal. If you post out “I’m in group B, I want to write 10 poems every week”, you’ll probably find another poet who wants to write at that speed. You can pick each other up and make new writer friends, who doesn’t want that?
GeShiDoMo can happen for as long as you want, during whenever you want, and if the writers and poets of tumblr join together you can become motivated to do what you never thought you could.
GeShiDoMo includes any goals you have at any pace, and you don’t lose it if you can’t do it. Change your goal and know that it may not be what you wanted, but you’ve gotten work done. And that’s what matters. Friends and progress.
Thank you, - Hesperus
definitely a neat idea!!
I listen to the ethical pronouncements of the leaders of the so-called religious revival going on in this country, including those of our President, and am able to distill only two firm commandments from them. The first commandment is this: ‘Stop thinking.’ The second commandment is this: ‘Obey.’ Only a person who has given up on the power of reason to improve life here on Earth, or a soldier in Basic Training could accept either commandment gladly: ‘Stop thinking’ and ‘Obey’. (…)
Now what is it, do you think, that makes Christians so bloodthirsty? … I think the problem is linguistic, and might be repaired, if the evangelists would only allow it, with startling simplicity. The Christian preachers exhort their listeners to love one another and to love their neighbours and so on. Love is simply too strong a word to be of much use in ordinary, day-to-day relationships. Love is for Romeo and Juliet…
I like to think that Jesus said in Aramaic: ‘Ye shall respect one another.’ That would be a sign to me that He really wanted to help us here on Earth, and not just in the Afterlife. Then again, He had no way of knowing what ludicrously high standards Hollywood was going to set for love…
And look at the spectrum of emotions we automatically think of when we hear the word ‘love’. If you can’t love your neighbour, you can at least like him. If you can’t like him, you can at least not give a damn. If you can’t ignore him, then you have to hate him, right? That’s a quick trip to hate, isn’t it? … It is such a logical trip, like the one from ‘white-hot’ to ‘ice-cold’, with ‘red-hot’, ‘hot’, ‘warm’, ‘tepid’, ‘room temperature’, ‘cool’, ‘chilly’ and ‘freezing’ in between…
There are all these people who have been told to do their best at loving. They fail, most of them. And why wouldn’t they fail, since loving is extremely difficult? … And when they fail to love, day after day, year in and year out, come one, come all, the logic of the language leads them to the seemingly inevitable conclusion that they must hate instead. The step beyond hating, of course, is killing in imaginary self-defence.
“Ye shall respect one another.” Now there is something almost anybody in reasonable mental health can do day after day, year in and year out, come one, come all, to everyone’s clear benefit. ‘Respect’ does not imply a spectrum of alternatives, some of them very dangerous. Respect is like a light switch. It is either on or off. And if we are no longer able to respect someone, we don’t feel like killing that person… we simply want to make him or her feel like something the cat [dragged] in. …
I have little hope that my simple reform will attract any appreciable support… The Christian quick trip from love to hate and murder is our principal entertainment.
I listen to the ethical pronouncements of the leaders of the so-called religious revival going on in this country, including those of our President, and am able to distill only two firm commandments from them. The first commandment is this: ‘Stop thinking.’ The second commandment is this: ‘Obey.’ Only a person who has given up on the power of reason to improve life here on Earth, or a soldier in Basic Training could accept either commandment gladly: ‘Stop thinking’ and ‘Obey’. (…)
Now what is it, do you think, that makes Christians so bloodthirsty? … I think the problem is linguistic, and might be repaired, if the evangelists would only allow it, with startling simplicity. The Christian preachers exhort their listeners to love one another and to love their neighbours and so on. Love is simply too strong a word to be of much use in ordinary, day-to-day relationships. Love is for Romeo and Juliet…
I like to think that Jesus said in Aramaic: ‘Ye shall respect one another.’ That would be a sign to me that He really wanted to help us here on Earth, and not just in the Afterlife. Then again, He had no way of knowing what ludicrously high standards Hollywood was going to set for love…
And look at the spectrum of emotions we automatically think of when we hear the word ‘love’. If you can’t love your neighbour, you can at least like him. If you can’t like him, you can at least not give a damn. If you can’t ignore him, then you have to hate him, right? That’s a quick trip to hate, isn’t it? … It is such a logical trip, like the one from ‘white-hot’ to ‘ice-cold’, with ‘red-hot’, ‘hot’, ‘warm’, ‘tepid’, ‘room temperature’, ‘cool’, ‘chilly’ and ‘freezing’ in between…
There are all these people who have been told to do their best at loving. They fail, most of them. And why wouldn’t they fail, since loving is extremely difficult? … And when they fail to love, day after day, year in and year out, come one, come all, the logic of the language leads them to the seemingly inevitable conclusion that they must hate instead. The step beyond hating, of course, is killing in imaginary self-defence.
“Ye shall respect one another.” Now there is something almost anybody in reasonable mental health can do day after day, year in and year out, come one, come all, to everyone’s clear benefit. ‘Respect’ does not imply a spectrum of alternatives, some of them very dangerous. Respect is like a light switch. It is either on or off. And if we are no longer able to respect someone, we don’t feel like killing that person… we simply want to make him or her feel like something the cat [dragged] in. …
I have little hope that my simple reform will attract any appreciable support… The Christian quick trip from love to hate and murder is our principal entertainment.

All aboard the snekbus